Research

Swipe sideways

1. Marketing & Growth9 Oct 2026 · #35Reddit Lead FinderFind Reddit threads where people already asked for the thing you do, and draft a reply that answers before it mentions you.InOffer: A tiny app that turns meeting notes into tasks with owners. For PMs and founders.…→OutThe draftMedium

   Preview this drop

   1. 0:00 The offer, boundedMeeting notes become tasks with owners. For PMs and founders. Not a transcriber, not for people who said they will not pay.
   2. 0:08 Three threadsA product-management post about dead action items. A startup post that wants a CRM. A productivity post that wants a free template and said no software.
   3. 0:16 Only one is a fitReply to the first. Skip the CRM thread because that is a different job. Skip the third because they asked for a template and refused tools.
   4. 0:24 The draftThe reply names a way to mark owners in the doc they already have, then one sentence: I build a small app that does this, happy to leave it out if self-promo is not allowed here.

   No daily video for this drop yet. The in and out lines above are the preview.

2. Research3 Oct 2026 · #29Claim ExtractorPaste an article or a transcript. Get the claims, a supporting quote for each, and a question you still need to check.InTranscript excerpt, interview with a support lead, 3 Oct 2026. Not a study.→OutCheckAdvanced

   Preview this drop

   1. 0:00 The excerptA support lead says a person now sees refunds over fifty euros. They refuse the phrase halved errors. Counts were not published.
   2. 0:08 ClaimsOne: refunds over fifty euros are no longer sent by the agent. Quote attached. Two: the lead will not say errors dropped.
   3. 0:16 Not a claimThe interviewer's 'halved errors' is excluded because the lead rejected it.
   4. 0:24 CheckWhat would settle the mood of 'calmer': the unpublished counts, which this transcript does not contain.

   No daily video for this drop yet. The in and out lines above are the preview.

3. Research21 Sep 2026 · #17Source Credibility CheckPaste a claim and the source text. Get what that source actually supports, what it does not, and the next source to open.InClaim I want to repeat: "The refund agent cut errors by half."→OutThe honest lineMedium

   Preview this drop

   1. 0:00 The hopeThe claim says errors were cut by half. The source is a vendor blog by the head of support.
   2. 0:08 What the text saysTickets closed without a checkbox went from 80 in February to 40 in a week of March. Error is never defined.
   3. 0:16 Not supportedHalf the errors is not in the text. A week is not a month. The author sells the agent.
   4. 0:24 The honest lineYou can say the blog reports fewer unreviewed closures after a checkbox, for one week, with no definition of error. Next source: the raw counts.

   No daily video for this drop yet. The in and out lines above are the preview.

4. Research9 Sep 2026 · #05Paper to BriefTurn an abstract and your notes into a one-page brief that quotes the paper and marks what you have not read.InTitle: Cache-aware agents for support mail. Authors: Ibarra, Cho. 2025. Not peer reviewed…→OutThe decision lineMedium

   Preview this drop

   1. 0:00 What was readAbstract plus the note that the refund tool is mocked and the human check is a checkbox.
   2. 0:08 The result, quotedMacro F1 0.61 to 0.74 on 400 tickets. Refunds over $50 still need a person.
   3. 0:16 The limitThe eval did not move live money. The brief says the appendix was not read, so latency is unknown.
   4. 0:24 The decision lineUseful as a design sketch for a mocked tool. Not evidence you can hand a payments review.

   No daily video for this drop yet. The in and out lines above are the preview.